johnyhoff's definitions
before he was president he started out in the national gaurd and then quikly moved to the oil buisnness where he did realy poorly in and often drove all his companys in the ground. Bush then decide he would try and do better in politics.when he became govenor of texas he became famous for destroying the education system he also met with taliban representives to discuss oil most likely. Other then that he didnt do much as govenor. when he became president the first thing that happened to the nation was the the biggest ression since the great depression.
then after 9/11 he invaded afghanstan with only 15,000 troops although the army was succesfull in getting the tailiban out of afghanstan it failed in acheving its primary objective and that was to capture Osma binladen. Smart and itelligent people and exspecialy the Democrats pointed out that afghanstan was a failure. Most americans though were just happy to see the U.S win another war. This would be one of the many factors bush would use to his advantage in his political campain even though the mission in afghanstan was incomplete. Any president would have done the same and could have made the same mistake but what bush did next ripped the country apart. Without permission of the U.N and the support of france,germany and every other country with a modern army except britian an intionaly spain(who eventuly pulled out).The iraq army was easly deafeted and no wmds were found even worse the 30,000 that had gone in were not enough thus the army activated it reserve and gaurd units who were ill prepaired. the occupation went from bad to worse and many americans and an uncounted Iraqis have perished. After bush had won re-election runnig on the same powerfull political machine the republicans he moved election dates up in Iraq by himself with that same stubborn attitude with succesful results.He also is currently thinking of getting rid of an economic safety net called social securty and turning it into an investmen plan where people have to go it alone in the stock market to make money when they retire. Although it sounds like a good idea its been pointed out that learnig to invest is realy hard and something based on luck another thing his britian did this in the 80,s and now have the worse pension plans in the world.
then after 9/11 he invaded afghanstan with only 15,000 troops although the army was succesfull in getting the tailiban out of afghanstan it failed in acheving its primary objective and that was to capture Osma binladen. Smart and itelligent people and exspecialy the Democrats pointed out that afghanstan was a failure. Most americans though were just happy to see the U.S win another war. This would be one of the many factors bush would use to his advantage in his political campain even though the mission in afghanstan was incomplete. Any president would have done the same and could have made the same mistake but what bush did next ripped the country apart. Without permission of the U.N and the support of france,germany and every other country with a modern army except britian an intionaly spain(who eventuly pulled out).The iraq army was easly deafeted and no wmds were found even worse the 30,000 that had gone in were not enough thus the army activated it reserve and gaurd units who were ill prepaired. the occupation went from bad to worse and many americans and an uncounted Iraqis have perished. After bush had won re-election runnig on the same powerfull political machine the republicans he moved election dates up in Iraq by himself with that same stubborn attitude with succesful results.He also is currently thinking of getting rid of an economic safety net called social securty and turning it into an investmen plan where people have to go it alone in the stock market to make money when they retire. Although it sounds like a good idea its been pointed out that learnig to invest is realy hard and something based on luck another thing his britian did this in the 80,s and now have the worse pension plans in the world.
none needed.read about the great deprsesion if want to see why its not a good idead to have people investing who shouldnt.
by johnyhoff May 13, 2005
Get the george bushmug. a man who makes me sick i have a military mind and when i herd he sent 15,000 to afghanstan i new it wasent enough to complete the entire mission and i was right although he defeated an easy to kill tailiban army he was unable to kill most of its top leaders exspecially osma.then he decided to invade iraq with a mere 30,000 and take it over and occupy it. when his dumbass figured out 30,000 wasent enough he brought in many reserve units who were not as well trained. although many died in war for oil he was still happy that he was able to pull off what no one else had ever done, and that was to takeover iraq before the U.N sanctions would force the goverment to change its way without american involvement or bloodshed. To him 1,500 dead is satisfactory to him but was it necsary?there were no WMD's there just lies,and saddam had no links to terrorists.the saddam we captured was not the same saddam donald rumsfeld shook hands with in the 80,s. it was a saddam who never had a chance a saddam who ruled iraq in fear of his own people because of several assination attempts,it wasent the saddam we thought it would be, no, it was the saddam bush,colin powel,every neo-conservitive made him to be.in afghanstan bush was like hitler at denmark and in iraq he was like half the brain his father was.
read about napleons occupation in egypt or about hitler descion to stop before his army reached denmark. build your knowledge then with that knowledge of the past youl be able to see that bushes decions in the present are and will be wrong.
by johnyhoff May 13, 2005
Get the george bushmug. devlops durring the ages of (3-4).becomes part of the unconscious and sensors the EGO implementing moral values into the descions we make so we dont use pathalogical behavior to get what we want.the super Ego is formed by the childs parrents emphisis on what is wrong and what is right. the super Ego is stronger in boys because of "castration anxiety" or the fact that the father is to the male child a big authority figure. girls usuly have a small super ego and are more Ego-tystical then boys because of "penis envy",and less disapline by the father figure is present since the female child does not have oeddipus issues.the super ego in some people never devlop and if it is not present at all that person becomes a maglomaniac.a healthy psyche(rare to find) is balanced.
(females pysche at work)-weak super Ego
girl:im rich and i vote republican
because it helps me and i dont mind if it hurts others,and if some one gotta a problem then fuck those bastards.(sortive like that bitch ann coulter)
(although girls tend to block off other needs so they can be greedy it still causes emotional problems for them so they feel guilty alot.
(male pysche at work)strong super ego
boy:i guess ill vote democrat its the right thing to do,i mean even though im rich i should sacerfice some things for others even though it may hurt me a little.(although conscious of what they are doing knowing that it may not bennift them boys tend to feel good about there descions since in the past there parrents would have rewarded them for a good moral descion who play more of a role in male pysche).these exmples explain why females have more emotional problems then men although a male minorty may suffer from more problems(then a male whos not a minorty) it usualy because racism hurts there self-a-steam.weak social conditions can also damage the male psyche a good example is a pimp may never have been through the oeddipus stages because there father was in jail.with out the father figure in the pimps life he usuly has a hard time showing compasion towards females since the pimps mother was the parrent autharian figure who he would conflict with.thus when the mother is domminant in the males super ego the male may become a pimp or somebody who is unable of showing effection and loves material things like women do.
girl:im rich and i vote republican
because it helps me and i dont mind if it hurts others,and if some one gotta a problem then fuck those bastards.(sortive like that bitch ann coulter)
(although girls tend to block off other needs so they can be greedy it still causes emotional problems for them so they feel guilty alot.
(male pysche at work)strong super ego
boy:i guess ill vote democrat its the right thing to do,i mean even though im rich i should sacerfice some things for others even though it may hurt me a little.(although conscious of what they are doing knowing that it may not bennift them boys tend to feel good about there descions since in the past there parrents would have rewarded them for a good moral descion who play more of a role in male pysche).these exmples explain why females have more emotional problems then men although a male minorty may suffer from more problems(then a male whos not a minorty) it usualy because racism hurts there self-a-steam.weak social conditions can also damage the male psyche a good example is a pimp may never have been through the oeddipus stages because there father was in jail.with out the father figure in the pimps life he usuly has a hard time showing compasion towards females since the pimps mother was the parrent autharian figure who he would conflict with.thus when the mother is domminant in the males super ego the male may become a pimp or somebody who is unable of showing effection and loves material things like women do.
by johnyhoff May 13, 2005
Get the super egomug. a conservitive women who wrote a book called "How to talk to a Liberal if you must".Its a pretty easy book to read and it doesent come up with any new political ideas or things that are revalutionary instead it just bashes democrats like Hitler bashed the jews,gypsys,soviets,blacks,ect in his book mein kampf.it is not uncommon for a conservitive to make slandours remarks about a political party(Aberham lincon used to this alot untill he was chalenged to a duel by a political oppenet then he became "honest abe"). this conservitive women also seems to be consumed by her own ideas or her conservitive viewpoint she either has a an extremely large EGO or and extremly large Super Ego. i suggest she sees a therapist(shes crazy)
by johnyhoff May 13, 2005
Get the Ann Coultermug. Fox news
journalists that are bushes payroll
anybody who is trying to get a politcal veiwpoint across weather it be democrat or Republican on the news.
journalists that are bushes payroll
anybody who is trying to get a politcal veiwpoint across weather it be democrat or Republican on the news.
by johnyhoff May 13, 2005
Get the mediamug. some one who stays trapped in traditional values. a politician who beileves in the idea that goverment should stay out of peoples lives and let the "invisble hand" control the market.Most conservitives arent true to their roots though these days they often want to make racial policys and try and stop civil right movements when they shouldve just listen to Adam smith the founder of their idealogy and stay out of those things unless they are trying to help the civil right movement. ironiclay although theyve been racsists since the 60,s they were founded on a anti-slavery platform.Psycologists have determed people who think conservitiely arent that smart.
conservitive thinker:some one who holds on to traditional values and is afraid to break away from his style of thinking.
conservitive president:Herbert Hoover cut taxes so much the country went into the the great depression well. He didnt know that something like that would happen.
conservitive president:Ronald reagan his supply-side economics or reaganomics sent the country into the biggest rescion since the depresion in the 30,s.
neo-conservitive president:George bush pretty musch the same as any other conservitive but beilieves in pre-emptive warfare sortive like reagan did but more drastic.
conservitive president:Herbert Hoover cut taxes so much the country went into the the great depression well. He didnt know that something like that would happen.
conservitive president:Ronald reagan his supply-side economics or reaganomics sent the country into the biggest rescion since the depresion in the 30,s.
neo-conservitive president:George bush pretty musch the same as any other conservitive but beilieves in pre-emptive warfare sortive like reagan did but more drastic.
by johnyhoff May 13, 2005
Get the conservitivemug. 