Hym Iam's definitions

The creative's creative

Who is it? It's me! I am Hym.

Hym "I'm the creative's creative. You don't HAVE to watch.... Anymore... And it's more than just representation. People found it compelling enough to include in their work. I'm not claiming it is more than it is, you're claim it's less. It's not more than it is and neither are you. And that's fine. That's your opinion. Your opinion is wrong but... Alright 🤷 ♂️ You can say you hate it. Good. I'm glad I can be a herpe on the pussy of life. It's letting you fuck it.

You're tearing it up man. Does it feel good? Anything I can do for you? Rub your back while you thrust? You getting warm? Should I spritz you with the water bottle. Throw you some money? But that herpe is just... THERE ain't it? Stop looking at it. Just ignore it and keep thrusting. You're already in. You already got it. But that shit is tight! Oof! Man, but that herpe is just pulsating ain't it? Don't matter. Look at her. She's loving it! And people have gotten paid for less. You can say that you DON'T hate it. That's cool too. Here. ✌ there's a peace sign for you. Did you know that if you type in 'Two' on android one of the auto-correct options if the peace-sign? It works with 'two' AND 'peace'. BUT ☝️👨 🏫 if you type in the NUMBER 2 it gives you dice with the number rolled to show 2. ⚁ See? You learned something. It's high quality and educational. Maybe a little demoralizing but, hey, this is kind of a macabre specticale anyway. A 'violent pornography' if you will (type that into your youtube seach bar). You can explain it away until you're blue in the face but maybe.... Just maybe... If I was going what you were doing she'd like it more... Hehehehehehehe.... Get it? Todd gets it... Heh... 'The creative's creative' "

by Hym Iam February 25, 2023

*Insert amorphous abstraction here*

You're missing the point. If you liking me doesn't translate to or manifest in the form of anything tangible, whether or not you like me is irrelevant. It's not conflation, you've rendered yourself moot. And it's not that what you're saying is untrue BUT it seems to be the cases that anything other than affirming their love of big fat cocks is unacceptable. I'm not doing anything that anybody else isn't doing. And I maintain that my position is and has alway been: I have a right to know what's going on around me. Even if that means the people around me lose a degree of social leverage. It isn't not my responsibility to accept an

imposed form of ignorance that is used explicitly to keep me from using my own capacity for choice and keep my behavior convenient. It's only "not real" because if it IS REAL then the random circumabulation of my mind is worth more than your entire life's work. In the same way that some atheist don't want to believe that God is real because if it IS REAL it means that your soul is going to burn forever.

Hym "The problem with the assertion that an outcome is the result of *Insert amorphous abstraction here* is that the logical conclusion always leads to an existential superiority claim. Do you *Insert amorphous abstraction here* as hard as an Alaskan crab fisherman? No? So then were does the disproportionate success come from? *insert existential superiority claim* Well, you could say, 'The job has a different "type" of difficulty' BUT are you accounting for mitigating variables in your self assessment? Does association mitigate the 'difficulty' of garnering disproportionate success? Then, why are people so willing to associate with you as opposed to other? *Insert existential superiority claim* So, what is the point of using these amorphous abstractions? It's a convenient out when you're engaged in verbal conflict. You can always drag the conflict down into the realm of semantics at a moments notice. Imagine, we're in conflict over our disparate outcomes. You posit *Insert amorphous abstraction here* as justification for the disparity. I am then forced to either accept your definition of what constitutes *Insert amorphous abstraction here* (Which I have no reason to do because we're in conflict) OR I have convince you that your definition of *Insert amorphous abstraction here* is flawed or incongruous with objective reality (Which I will never be able to do because you would never render your own outcome unjustified). It's just a word-trick."

by Hym Iam February 26, 2023

Scanners

WOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!! Holy shit man! That was crazy! That was awesome! That is insane! What the hell, I.... Is that what a "cronenberg" is? Like a reference to the director? That's crazy dawg wow! That contents of that movie that is on Hbo Max are insane!

Hym "Holy shit we're like a 'scanners'! We're like a Benjamin Pierce! Except not crazy! And not dead! And stronger than the main character!"

Iam "You my entire life, when people make reference to scanners, I have been conflating it with 'a scanner darkly' and I couldn't see what all the fuss was about but holy shit man! That was insane!"

Hym " 'A scanner darkly'!? I remember we thought 'What is the fucking point of all this' when we watched it."

by Hym Iam February 27, 2023

Middle-ground fallacy

The mistaken belief that the truth lies somewhere in between to opposing propositions.

Man "It's the women!"

Woman "It's the men!"

Sophist "Well... *Insert middle-ground fallacy*"

Hym "Wrong! I can prove it! By asking a simple question: What is the selection criteria? If it is 6ft tall (14.5%), Six figure salary (17%), 6 inch+ dick (16%) and we omit overlap and assume women are willing to settle for 1 out of the 3, we have only 47% of men who can meet the selection criteria. If THAT is what constitutes 'The best man available' (in the context of hypergamy) AND if we assume that Jordan is correct in saying that they should all just get married and start a family, What are the OTHER 53% of women supposed to do? For that to work, over HALF the women STILL have to CHANGE THEIR SELECTION CRITERIA. What then? How is that supposed to work? The women don't WANT to do it and are TOLD NOT TO BY PARENTS WHO WANT THEM TO HAVE THE BEST PARTNER AVAILABLE. The men who have overlapping qualities don't have to do it so their opinions are unlimited. And here we are...

What can men do about any of that? 'Try your best!'? 'Strife nobly into the dawn!'?Only 17% of the men CAN have jobs that pay 6 figures or more because THERE ARE A FINITE NUMBER OF JOBS THAT PAY THAT MUCH. What, do you expect them to increase the pay rate of a broader number of job to 6 figures? McDonald's cashier 100,000 a year. Then you can finally get a girlfriend. The other 2 are a roll of the dice. How is it at all men's fault? What is the selection criteria? Broadly? And that middle-ground fallacy applies to the schizophrenia thing too! It's not a matter of 'well, maybe it's a little of both'. At this point it's 'yeah, they're doing the thing they are doing and they have been doing it for years, and now I'm hyper-vigilant about it so I'm looking for it everywhere!' I don't claim to be right all of the time about it. And as a thought experiment I respond to things as though they were said to or about me. But that's not the same!"

by Hym Iam February 27, 2023

Capitalism

The problem with it is that the bureaucracy is an apathetic floodgate against the perpetual need of the populous rather than expedient service providing system. The same with the Healthcare system.

Hym "Ok, to use that as an example is so intellectually dishonest. 'If we give poor people money they'll end up coked out in a ditch' The people who are doing that are already going to do that. You just demolished your own argument with Ben's gun control argument. 'We can't ban guns because bad people will get guns anyway'. The people who would be junkies are already junkies. So, nobody gets any money just because some people will use the money for evil!? I might need money to not die one day! Now replace the word money... with the word gun... Here- I'll just do it for you. 'So, nobody gets any guns just because some people will us the money for evil!? I might need guns to not die one day!' See that? It may be primitive but at least it's not self-defeating. How much did they give to elon in carbon credits? Is it more than 3 billion?

It's bad for people to shoot the government's (The people's) money into their arms but the greatest thing ever when they shoot it into space? So, no, that's not a reason to NOT redistribute wealth to the bottom of the hierarchy. Yes the money is already being redistributed BUT where is it being redistributed to a place that it SHOULDN'T BE? (See the through-line there?) That's the core issue here. Does elon need it more than any random poor person? To NOT GO BANKRUPT? Yes... Yes, absolutely... In general? No. I also don't think that the redistribution need to come from the government, but rather, the employers or from the employers by way of the government. If the government is giving you money (in any form) you should be paying it back to the people the government to the money from.... I forgot to use the word 'Capitalism'... Oops... Aw shit... Too many characters..."

by Hym Iam February 27, 2023

Junkies

And there are plenty of rich junkies dawg. Are you kinding me? Nikki sixx? Russell brand (not any more but still)? Everyone on Epstien's list? Joe biden's son? You're perfectly fine with people spending their money on impulsive pleasure! You're not doing anything to stop ANY them from indulging in their impulsive pleasures. You're paying to feed their addiction every time you buy a ticket or vote for Biden (not that you would vote for Biden). Like the redistribution of wealth, the spending of money on impulsive pleasure is already happening. You dare use my own spells against me Potter? Did you think that would stump me? So what makes Russel so special? He's one of the special golden chosen people! He SHOULD have all of the money because he deserves it more. *Insert existential superiority claim here* He can... read the things I write... Like... Real good dawg... So he can do all the drugs he wants... And then use his money to go to a place to get off the drugs... and then live off the money forever... and generate wealth with his likeness...

Hym "Saying we can't give poor people money because they will spend it on drugs and become junkies is like saying we can't let anybody go to a Motely Crew concert because they are going to spend the money on drugs. Ridiculous. The position of redistributing money is may simplistic but your position is ridiculous.'

by Hym Iam February 27, 2023

Matriarchy 2

Like the velociraptor from Jurassic park... Clever girl... (I think that's a reference. Now go! Find it! We're canonically playing find the reference still! Remember!? Remember that thing I said before!? That still applies! Or DOES it!? OoOoOoOoOoOo!)

Hym "Real cute... It's cute, really... Reeeeeeeeaal cute-"

Iam "What are you talking about!?"

Hym "The matriarchy 2... Somebody thought she was a fucking smarty-pants didn't she? No no no it's cute. Doesn't work on me but cute... Reeeeeeal-"

Iam "STOP SAYING CUTE! Jesus!"

Hym 😑 "......... Cute."

Iam 😮 💨

by Hym Iam February 27, 2023