Scientific deism or evidence based deism is a deist current that advocates empirical, rigorous and massive studies and find if God, gods, spiritual beings, extraphysics and supernaturality are actually real or not, mainly focusing on technological development, such as on technodeism. The main difference from technodeism is that technodeism is just about technological search and scientific deism is about the whole search and research.
"Scientific deism might be really useful on countering neoatheism inside science, but it is unlikely scientific deism will get mainstream such as neoatheism soon."
"Scientific deism is gonna be revolutionary, united with technodeism, we might find out if gods, spiritual beings, supernaturalism and extraphysics are actually real or not, and it is gonna be like seach for aliens, and help search for aliens, since aliens might be spiritual beings and gods... So, scientific deism might be really useful on search for aliens and for intelligent non-human life forms."
"Scientific deism is a third way inside science, since it understands gods and spiritual beings might not be 100% real and living among humans nor be inventions of people's minds and heads. So, scientific deism is amazing due to it, and technodeism shows it really well."
"Scientific deism is gonna be revolutionary, united with technodeism, we might find out if gods, spiritual beings, supernaturalism and extraphysics are actually real or not, and it is gonna be like seach for aliens, and help search for aliens, since aliens might be spiritual beings and gods... So, scientific deism might be really useful on search for aliens and for intelligent non-human life forms."
"Scientific deism is a third way inside science, since it understands gods and spiritual beings might not be 100% real and living among humans nor be inventions of people's minds and heads. So, scientific deism is amazing due to it, and technodeism shows it really well."
by Full Monteirism January 7, 2021
by The Mastuh October 8, 2008
About to go masturbate
by Barnie August 2, 2018
Something that is undeniably true. This cannot be argued with or challenged on any grounds known to man.
by D Nugget October 6, 2005
Offering unscientific interpretations based upon insufficient data, faulty logic or poor reasoning. The term came from a humorous Freudian slip when reading a Digg.com article entitled "Scientific Glassblowing."
That science pundit was spouting off some nonsense about super-string theory, but it was clear he had no idea what he was talking about; it was nothing more than scientific gasblowing...
by Michael Gmirkin June 13, 2008
Scientific principles are general rules that are followed while doing science or rules that nature tends to follow.
Scientific Principle Examples
The Principle of Least Time a.k.a. Fermat's Principle which states that "light travels between two given points along the path of shortest time."
The principle of cause and effect which states that in order for something to happen there must be an underlying cause or is contingent.
Archimedes Principle: the buoyant force on an object is equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by that object
Examples where principles guide peoples actions would be: making sure all your hypotheses are testable and falsifiable (as opposed to unfalsifiable claims, see Russell's Teapot)
The Principle of Least Time a.k.a. Fermat's Principle which states that "light travels between two given points along the path of shortest time."
The principle of cause and effect which states that in order for something to happen there must be an underlying cause or is contingent.
Archimedes Principle: the buoyant force on an object is equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by that object
Examples where principles guide peoples actions would be: making sure all your hypotheses are testable and falsifiable (as opposed to unfalsifiable claims, see Russell's Teapot)
by Tibriel August 25, 2017
Translation from scientist to normal person speak: We honestly have no fucking idea.
Sometimes, even scientists don't know what's going on. At times like that they tend to act like everyone else, which is that they assume the most popular idea must be correct. Unfortunately, this is sophistry, not science.
Sometimes, even scientists don't know what's going on. At times like that they tend to act like everyone else, which is that they assume the most popular idea must be correct. Unfortunately, this is sophistry, not science.
Dr John Snow, I am tired of your incessant prattling about Cholera being a water-born disease! There is a scientific consensus that it is spread by a miasma and that is final!
by Korgmeister March 21, 2005