A
guy who beats the shit out of his wife and wins a baseball
game in the same day has accomplished 2 things that day, one considered (agreed to be) by most people to be negative, the other positive. You could
ask OJ about what that's
like, nobody thinks of OJ without thinking of a criminal, people hardly remember he played football too. If you're gonna judge one book by its cover, shouldn't you judge all
books by their covers? The same people who don't think each person is different are usually the ones telling people not to judge
books by their covers, and that there's more than meets the eye in the first place (except with guys
like OJ or wife beating baseball players, for some reason they think you should judge certain people if they tell you to do so). They tell you don't underestimate them, but its fine if you ridicule others.
Judging one kind of book by its
cover and not another is hypocrisy. Since
everyone's a
hypocrite, everyone would have a cause to investigate hypocrisy in others.