7 definitions by zerO_One
(Verb) : when a person (usually female) acts in such a way as to indicate rejection because they misinterpreted your actions as romantic advances, despite the fact that to any sane third person observer, they would not be considered as such. People who falsely reject usually suffer from some form of narcissism and have an overly inflated view of themselves and hence this is why they tend to perceive the most innocuous actions as advances on them because how could you not be trying to get with them?
EXAMPLE 1:
Boy- excuse me, do you have a pencil I could borrow? I forgot mine at home :/
Girl- no I'm sorry, I have a boyfriend already..
(In this case, the boy has experienced a false rejection)
EXAMPLE 2:
Boy: Hey Amy, how are you!
Amy: Hey FRIEND, I'm good, how are you?
Boy: Good, just wondering if we could meet up to discuss our group project?
Amy: sure FRIEND, can we do somewhere public like Starbucks or something, yeah friend?
*boy thinking*: why is this bitch trying so hard to make sure I understand she sees me as just a friend? Does she think I'm trying to get with her? OH GOD...SHE DOES...FUCK...I'M BEING FALSELY REJECTED RIGHT NOW! Damn this conceited bitch!
Boy- excuse me, do you have a pencil I could borrow? I forgot mine at home :/
Girl- no I'm sorry, I have a boyfriend already..
(In this case, the boy has experienced a false rejection)
EXAMPLE 2:
Boy: Hey Amy, how are you!
Amy: Hey FRIEND, I'm good, how are you?
Boy: Good, just wondering if we could meet up to discuss our group project?
Amy: sure FRIEND, can we do somewhere public like Starbucks or something, yeah friend?
*boy thinking*: why is this bitch trying so hard to make sure I understand she sees me as just a friend? Does she think I'm trying to get with her? OH GOD...SHE DOES...FUCK...I'M BEING FALSELY REJECTED RIGHT NOW! Damn this conceited bitch!
by zerO_One May 19, 2017
The practice of using sophisticated terms and/or concepts incorrectly or without thorough understanding of their intricate nuances and thus resulting in a flawed body of knowledge (i.e. erroneous beliefs). Typically people who partake in pseudo-intellectualism do so with authority and conviction as a result of some effort to understand the concepts and/or terms but lack the mental capacity to synthesize true knowledge from their efforts and thus typically do not know they are intellectually mistaken.
Yeah, that dude Phillip and I got into a political discussion and he started talking about how Sanders wants to subsidize everything and how Trump economic policies will increase the value of the dollar. He clearly doesn't even know what the word "subsidize" means, that there is a fine example of some pseudo-intellectualism.
by zerO_One March 16, 2017
A PowerPoint professor is one whose lectures are predominantly based off of lifeless and recycled PowerPoints. These professors typically bring no vigor to class, they're just there to collect a paycheck. Class participation and engagement is also usually at a minimum or non-existent altogether. These professors can blow through tons of material in short periods of time with a swift click of a button, and usually refuse to provide a more narrow study guide for exams, usually falling back on "just go over my PowerPoints". Oddly enough, these professors are clueless about their performance despite their "Does anyone have any questions?" being met with nothing chirps of crickets.
Dude, don't take data mining with him, he's nothing but a PowerPoint professor. Trust me, he's been using the same PowerPoint since Microsoft invented PowerPoint.
by zerO_One May 7, 2018
When you take a piss but don't shake it off completely and feel a drop or two come out after you put your wang back inside your pants.
by zerO_One March 16, 2017
(noun) - The willful suspension of logic and reason so as to allow the belief of a claim that either:
A) has no evidence in support of
OR
B) has evidence in direct support of the exact opposite of the claim.
A) has no evidence in support of
OR
B) has evidence in direct support of the exact opposite of the claim.
Person1: Jesus was born of a virgin mother.
Person2: That's impossible. Parthenogenesis has never been observed in mammals and even if it by chance transpired, Jesus would have been female as human mothers can only donate Y chromosomes and males require both the X and Y chromosomes.
Person1: Well I have FAITH in the claim so fuck you, I'll believe what I want despite the overwhelming evidence and damn near proof showing that my belief cannot possibly be true.
Person2: That's impossible. Parthenogenesis has never been observed in mammals and even if it by chance transpired, Jesus would have been female as human mothers can only donate Y chromosomes and males require both the X and Y chromosomes.
Person1: Well I have FAITH in the claim so fuck you, I'll believe what I want despite the overwhelming evidence and damn near proof showing that my belief cannot possibly be true.
by zerO_One March 16, 2017
(noun): When a woman intentionally leaves a sexy/provocative photo as the last snap in her story, knowing full well it'll be visible from the main feed. This then encourages males to want to see said photo, however, the female has cleverly placed it after some absurd number of non-revealing and, honestly, quit boring photos. The woman is then easily able to see which males put in the work to get to said photo and thereby allowing her to calculate which males fancy her. SnapTrapping usually has the effect of feeding a woman's ego.
guy1: Bro, did you see Ashley's snap last night? Them titties was poppin!
guy2: Na bro, I ain't about to get suckered into that snaptrap by tig ol' bitty Ashley!
guy2: Na bro, I ain't about to get suckered into that snaptrap by tig ol' bitty Ashley!
by zerO_One June 10, 2018
a miraculous mental process of weaving intricate threads of reasoning in complex, tangential, and often contradictory ways to give the mental gymnast the illusion that they has resolved the cognitive dissonance stemming from objective facts debunking their firmly held beliefs, thereby allowing the mental gymnast to continue on with life still holding onto the flawed beliefs while still acknowledging the objective facts.
Person1: God is the creator of EVERYTHING, all knowing, all good, and present in all things everywhere at all times.
Person2: So then if people are evil, then at least one of those divine attributes must be false.
Person1: No, because of the concept of freewill.
Person2: Dude, now that there is some MENTAL GYMNASTICS.
Person2: So then if people are evil, then at least one of those divine attributes must be false.
Person1: No, because of the concept of freewill.
Person2: Dude, now that there is some MENTAL GYMNASTICS.
by zerO_One March 16, 2017