Farrell’s Theorem

Even worse than Murphy’s Law. Farrell’s Theorem states that anything that can go wrong will not gl wrong, just simply do something even worse can happen instead. This also provides comedic effect.

Due t Farrell’s Theorem Franklin missed getting hit by the car, just so the bus behind could obliterate him.

by Slydog11 December 17, 2021

Quadralic Theorem

You dumb as hell if you think this a real thing.
Thiccoldman thinks you retarded.

You dumb as hell if you thought the quadralic theorem was a real thing

by Thiccoldman December 29, 2021

Paslay’s Theorem

Paslay’s Theorem states that the length of the penis is more accurately described by the ratio between weight, height and penis length. Paslay’s Theorem is known to describe the phenomenon of short and skinny men seeming to have large penises regardless of length.

Damn that man is packing! No man it’s just Paslay’s Theorem.

by Signumsixty April 3, 2022

Infinite Funny Theorem

1. When you create a new funny via forgetting the original funny, thus theoretically creating a source of infinite funny; When humor originates from the setup of a joke but the punchline being forgotten in a comedic fashion

2. The Scientific Theory that, if an immortal monkey spent all of eternity clicking on random keys on a keyboard, it would eventually write every joke that could possibly be conceived.

Rick: "Hey, I heard a funny joke the other day! So, a Tibetan Monk walks into a bar in order to observe the lifestyle of people living in a first world country and an urban setting, and then-"
Vick: "Wow, he walked into a bar? That must've hurt!"
Rick: "Haha, you fucking moron, that's not what I meant you failed excuse of a human being."
Vick: "So... where's the funny?"
Rick: "Oh, I forgot I was supposed to be telling a joke-"
Vick: "Hah! You forgot the funny!"
Rick: "No, it's the infinite funny theorem. By forgetting the funny, I've created another funny."
Vick: "Wow, that's pretty funny!"
Pause for laughter. If it does not ensue, then your friends are not based enough.

by Based Guitar December 20, 2020

Infinite Funny Theorem

1. When you create a new funny via forgetting the original funny, thus theoretically creating a source of infinite funny; When humor originates from the setup of a joke but the punchline being forgotten in a comedic fashion

2. The Scientific Theory that, if an immortal monkey spent all of eternity clicking on random keys on a keyboard, it would eventually write every joke that could possibly be conceived.

Rick: "Hey, I heard a funny joke the other day! So, a Tibetan Monk walks into a bar in order to observe the lifestyle of people living in a first world country and an urban setting, and then-"
Vick: "Wow, he walked into a bar? That must've hurt!"
Rick: "Haha, you fucking moron, that's not what I meant you failed excuse of a human being."
Vick: "So... where's the funny?"
Rick: "Oh, I forgot I was supposed to be telling a joke-"
Vick: "Hah! You forgot the funny!"
Rick: "No, it's the infinite funny theorem. By forgetting the funny, I've created another funny."
Vick: "Wow, that's pretty funny!"
Pause for laughter. If it does not ensue, then your friends are not based enough.

by Based Guitar December 20, 2020

Lion king theorem

When two people have an argument. They play the lion king movie in the background, one guy can only speak while simba is on screen and the other may speak while simba is off screen.

The presidential debate is on tonight ? Fuck a mediator let’s use the lion king theorem.

by Spinter April 22, 2021

Vaccarella Theorem of Quadrilaterals

Created in 2021, the Vaccarella Theorem of Quadrilaterals places an emphasis on the vagueness which can be applied to everyday examples. A rectangle, in terms of quadrilaterals, is a specific parallelogram in which each pair of adjacent sides is perpendicular. On the contrary, squares are regular quadrilaterals that have four equal sides, along with four right angles. Using this information, one can identify that squares have more specific conditions than rectangles. Moreover, all squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. This means that squares can be viewed as the less vague topic in any situation, due to them being less likely to occur in the world of quadrilaterals. On the other hand, Rectangles can be seen as the more vague topic, due to them requiring less conditions to exist. One could use this when analyzing any given situation. For example, if one was to look at the issue of poverty within the United States, the Vaccarella Theorem of Quadrilaterals could be applied by saying that the general issue of poverty is the rectangle, whereas the issue of homelessness could be seen as the square. The Vaccarella Theorem of Quadrilaterals goes further than just rectangles and squares, and if needed, one can apply even more quadrilaterals to further differentiate parts of a situation, by simply increasing the complexity of quadrilaterals and adding them to the comparison.

"That was a crazy game, too bad the defense played so bad. I was just thinking about the Vaccarella Theorem of Quadrilaterals. The whole team was pretty bad today actually, it's like the team as a whole was the rectangle, but that one turnover in the fourth quarter was definitely the square."

by Beetlejesus November 9, 2021