when one scream the loudest in an among us lobby and besides all the evidence, everyone votes for the one accused by the loudest
IT'S PINK IT HAS TO BE
HE KILLED MY GRANDMA
IT HAS TO BE
"the entire lobby proceeds to vote pink out, ignoring all prior evidence"
Thus, the "Among us theorem"
HE KILLED MY GRANDMA
IT HAS TO BE
"the entire lobby proceeds to vote pink out, ignoring all prior evidence"
Thus, the "Among us theorem"
by WateryBadZach August 10, 2023

Harnessing the power of your semen, you erase all evidence from the absolute power-bombing you gave your significant other by cum-bending all of that chunky nut back into your scrotum.
"Bro I can't let my girl know about my cheating but I don't know how??
"No worries man, I just used the Reverse Nut Theorem. It's completely foolproof."
"No worries man, I just used the Reverse Nut Theorem. It's completely foolproof."
by Dongerlxrd December 04, 2023

by Chaommonaza December 01, 2019

Rickshaw's Optimum Theorem states that at any moment of lethargy, regardless of anticipation or willingness, shall productivity invariably be inferior to that of complete inaction.
By Rickshaw’s Optimum Theorem, I should do this leave this assignment for tomorrow as I am very tired.
by Victor Akhmetzyanov October 01, 2024

The Hitler Theorem is in relation to how a stimulus affects you negatively day by day more than Adolf Hitler does. If something affects you worse than Adolf Hitler, then The Hitler Theorem can prove objectively that the stimulus is worse than Adolf Hitler.
"I'm tired of all this work my teacher is assigning me! It annoys me more than Adolf Hitler does, therefore according to The Hitler Theorem this homework is worse than Adolf Hitler!"
by Theoremist November 22, 2023

When two people have an argument. They play the lion king movie in the background, one guy can only speak while simba is on screen and the other may speak while simba is off screen.
by Spinter April 22, 2021

Simply stated; in the public forum, delivery style outperforms content integrity as a potentiator of true communication. In the world of debate, well composed and articulated bullshit, especially when delivered extemporaneously, can stand toe-to-toe with poorly communicated: absolute truth, brilliant insight, inspired wisdom, or even genius-level analysis any day of the week.
Although candidate A clearly has a superior command of the subject matter, they tend to get nervous, and stutter and stammer, and seem to grasp for the right word, while candidate B who is well known for his silky sooth speaking style, broadcast-quality voice, and skill in weaving Improvisational comedy into his responses, once again, Vaughan’s Theorem accurately predicts that B will appear to win the question in spite of demonstrated cluelessness regarding the question that was posed.
by Kenneth A. Vaughan August 18, 2020
