3 definitions by OLPZach
It means "John Lennon is dead". Alternatively, 'john' can be substituted for any other name to create the same effect
Originating from 4chan, "john is kill" was the assumed 'title' of a thread about the assassination of John Lennon seemingly typed out by someone with very little English skills, to comedic effect. The OP was asking people where they were and what they were doing when they heard about John's assassination. Now the thread is sometimes recreated using the same picture of John and using the same format, although sometimes Heath Ledger is used instead (or heat ledger, as it is typed out in homage to the original OPs poor English)
Originating from 4chan, "john is kill" was the assumed 'title' of a thread about the assassination of John Lennon seemingly typed out by someone with very little English skills, to comedic effect. The OP was asking people where they were and what they were doing when they heard about John's assassination. Now the thread is sometimes recreated using the same picture of John and using the same format, although sometimes Heath Ledger is used instead (or heat ledger, as it is typed out in homage to the original OPs poor English)
"apology for poor english
when were you when john lenin dies?
i was sat at home eating smegma butter when pjotr ring
'john is kill'
'no'"
when were you when john lenin dies?
i was sat at home eating smegma butter when pjotr ring
'john is kill'
'no'"
by OLPZach January 9, 2014
A trait usually found in whores. They MAY only love or date smart guys, but that doesn't mean they won't also fuck around with other guys to get what all women want: a dominant, bad boy who may or may not have a sizable penis and who definitely must know how to use it (among other appendages). Basically, if you are trying to get with a girl who identifies as a sapiosexual, be careful. Sapiosexual does not mean the same thing as monogamous.
Mary told me she was a sapiosexual, so I took it as meaning she wasn't a whore. I was wrong when I found her impaled on a big black dick one night. Guess I'll smarten up from now on.
by OLPZach July 19, 2014
Honestly, they are just the opposite gender to men. Nothing more, nothing less. All this bullshit about what a woman is or isn't is ALL purely opinionated. All that can be said is that men and women have some differing physical qualities, but honestly, those things are not even that important in a world where you can blow up half of France with the push of a button, yeah? So enough with all this back and forth bantering about who's being sexist and who isn't. FYI, the top definition for women on this site may not be exactly sexist, but it is horribly biased and suffers from the same sort of one sidedness that it claims it is trying to prevent. Yes, women are more than just walking sex toys but at the same time they can be just as cruel, unforgiving and shitty as men. There ARE as many cunt women as there are cunt men. If you post definitions that are essentially "women are angelic and pure and men are dicks", you are either a bitter woman or a pussy whipped man who needs to grow a spine and learn how to attract women without kissing their asses (which can be as dirty or more dirty than a man's ass).
The fact of the matter is, both women and men get an equal share of gripe in society. Women might not be viewed as overall as good as men from a physical, professional, or sometimes mental point of view, but on the same token, men are expected to always be "manly" and show as little intimate emotion as possible and fight all the time and protect the countries we're from and not be afraid of anything. Whereas women who are "strong" (traditionally a male quality) are praised, and so are women who are "dainty and cute" (a female quality). Men who are "dainty and cute" are viewed as faggots, (to be blunt) however.
Women are the opposite of men. That's really all there is to it. If you think they deserve special treatment, or you are a woman and you think you do, you are a sexist. Simple as that, really. A gentleman acts chivalrous to all, regardless of gender. If you know a man who only acts chivalrous to women, and you think he is a "gentleman", you are wrong. He's just an asshole who knows how to get laid.
Women are the opposite of men. That's really all there is to it. If you think they deserve special treatment, or you are a woman and you think you do, you are a sexist. Simple as that, really. A gentleman acts chivalrous to all, regardless of gender. If you know a man who only acts chivalrous to women, and you think he is a "gentleman", you are wrong. He's just an asshole who knows how to get laid.
by OLPZach April 8, 2014