Theory of Conservation of Causality in FTL Scenarios

A framework proposing that even in faster-than-light travel, causality is conserved—not violated, just transformed. The Theory of Conservation of Causality in FTL Scenarios suggests that FTL doesn't create paradoxes because causality, like energy, has a budget. You can spend it, move it around, but you can't destroy it. In FTL travel, causal influence might be redistributed across spacetime in ways we don't yet understand—but the total causal structure remains constant. The theory resolves the classic "FTL equals time travel" paradox by positing that causality is conserved: any apparent backward causation is balanced by forward causation elsewhere. You can't kill your grandfather because causality has a budget, and that transaction would overdraw the account.

Theory of Conservation of Causality in FTL Scenarios "They said FTL means time travel—therefore impossible. Conservation of Causality says: maybe causality is conserved, like energy. The ship goes FTL, but somewhere, somehow, causality balances the books. No paradox, just physics we don't yet understand. You can't kill your grandfather because causality won't approve the transaction."

Theory of Conservation of Causality in FTL Scenarios by Abzugal March 5, 2026

Theory of Preservation of Causality in FTL Scenarios

A framework asserting that causality is preserved absolutely, even under FTL conditions—meaning that no matter how fast you travel, cause will always precede effect in all reference frames. The Theory of Preservation of Causality in FTL Scenarios suggests that FTL doesn't lead to paradox because there's a deeper structure—perhaps a privileged frame, perhaps quantum consistency—that ensures causal order remains intact. Unlike conservation (which allows transformation), preservation insists on invariance: causality is not just balanced but maintained. FTL might be possible, but it will never allow you to change the past because causality itself prevents it.

Theory of Preservation of Causality in FTL Scenarios "Warp drive engaged—faster than light, but when they arrived, they hadn't caused anything that wasn't already caused. Preservation of Causality says: FTL doesn't break causality; it just bends around it. The universe has safeguards. You can go fast, but you can't outrun cause and effect. They're always ahead of you, waiting."

Theory of Preservation of Causality in FTL Scenarios by Abzugal March 5, 2026

Theory of Elasticity of Causality in FTL Scenarios

A speculative framework proposing that causality has elastic properties that allow it to stretch, compress, or deform under FTL conditions without breaking. The Theory of Elasticity of Causality in FTL Scenarios suggests that cause-effect relationships can stretch across spacetime in ways that look like paradox but are actually elastic deformations—like a rubber band stretched but not snapped. When the FTL journey ends, causality snaps back to its proper order. The theory identifies causality's elastic limits: how far can you stretch it before it breaks? FTL might be possible within those limits, but exceed them and causality snaps—with unknown consequences.

Theory of Elasticity of Causality in FTL Scenarios "The ship returned before it left—or so it seemed. Elasticity of Causality says: causality stretched, like a rubber band, during the FTL flight. When the journey ended, it snapped back. No paradox, just elasticity. The question is how far you can stretch it before it breaks—and no one wants to find out."

Theory of Elasticity of Causality in FTL Scenarios by Abzugal March 5, 2026